3
སྐྱེས བར 1:| མ
10 20yoぷ
TXY: CH
.IIV
4 bus
20 82.
nam demon on 11.
auri wanok ruot jant sjon I
Tlf vd pher Jart to 64
RC 0 19”.
H GOYA AIGATHONG.
$
DO Y SE
esteau)
****
301
Service Order, and I cannot believe that he has made any statement to me which he did not believe to be true. I shall await the instructions of the Secretary of State in this matter.
3.
The fact that I have been unable to agree with Your Honour in most of the subjects which have been raised by you is a matter of regret to me, but I am glad to learn that "the position which I have of late assumed" is regarded by Your Honour as "entirely satisfactory". That position is however hardly correctly described in paragraph 7 of your last letter. I adhere to my opinion that the views of the Chief Justice should be asked when appointments or changes are made in the Registry of the Supreme Court but that is not the same thing as recognising the Chief Justice as Head of the Department, having control of the Registry.
Speaking generally the points raised in the remaining paragraphs of your letter are covered by the Secretary of State's decision, and since the correspondence is being forwarded to him, at your request, for further consideration it will serve no useful purpose for me to discuss them. I may add with all courtesy that however unfamiliar I may be (as Your Honour says) with the working
3
སྐྱེས བར 1:| མ
10 20yoぷ
TXY: CH
.IIV
4 bus
20 82.
** nam demon on 11.
auri wanok ruot jant sjon I
Tlf vd pher Jart to 64
RC 0 19”.
H GOYA AIGATHONG.
$
DO Y SE
esteau)
****
301
Service Order, and I cannot believe that he has made any
statement to me which he did not believe to be true. I
shall await the instructions of the Secretary of State in
this matter.
3.
The fact that I have been unable to agree
with Your Honour in most of the subjects which have been
raised by you is a matter of regret to me, but I am glad
to learn that "the position which I have of late assumed"
is regarded by Your Honour an "antiraly satisfactory". That
position is however hardly correctly described in para-
-graph 7 of your last letter. I adhere to my opinion that
the views of the Chief Justice should be asked when ap-
-pointments or changes are made in the Registry of the
Supreme Court but that is not the same thing as recognising
the Chief Justice as Hoad of the Department, having control
of the Registry.
Speaking generally the points raised in the
remaining paragraɔha of your letter are covered by the
Secretary of State's decision, and since the correspondence
is being forwarded to him, at your request, for further
consideration it will serve no useful purpose for me to
discuss them. I may add with all courtesy that however
unfamiliar I may be (as Your Honour says) with the working
of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.